Monday, June 16, 2025

Study Summary: The Effect of Essential Oils on Odour Control, Life Satisfaction, and Stoma Compliance in Colostomy Patients

 



Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer globally and often requires surgical intervention involving stoma creation. A colostomy significantly impacts patients' physical, psychological, and social well-being. One major challenge for individuals with a colostomy is the unpleasant odor from gas and fecal output, which can lead to embarrassment, low self-esteem, reduced social interaction, and poor quality of life.

This study explores how lavender essential oil and peppermint essential oil used inside stoma bags affect odor elimination , life satisfaction , and stoma compliance among patients with permanent colostomies.


Objectives

The research aimed to evaluate whether adding lavender or peppermint essential oils into stoma bags:

  1. Reduces odor intensity (Hypothesis 1 )
  2. Improves life satisfaction (Hypothesis 2 )
  3. Enhances stoma compliance (Hypothesis 3 )

Methodology

  • Study Design : Randomized controlled trial with repeated measurements.
  • Setting : Conducted at a university hospital’s stoma therapy unit between January 2021 and May 2022.
  • Participants : A total of 102 patients with permanent colostomies.
  • Groups :
    • Lavender Oil Group
    • Peppermint Oil Group
    • Control Group (no oil application)
  • Intervention : A few drops of either lavender or peppermint oil were added daily to the stoma bags of participants over a specified period.
  • Measurements :
    • Odor Intensity : Assessed using a standardised scale before and after the intervention.
    • Life Satisfaction : Measured using the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS).
    • Stoma Compliance : Evaluated using a validated stoma compliance scale.

Key Findings

1. Odor Elimination

  • Both lavender oil and peppermint oil significantly reduced odor intensity compared to the control group.
  • Statistically significant decreases in odor levels were observed in both experimental groups post-intervention (p = 0.000 for both).

2. Life Satisfaction

  • Participants in the lavender and peppermint oil groups reported higher life satisfaction scores after the intervention.
  • This suggests that reducing odor had a positive impact on emotional well-being and overall perception of life quality.

3. Stoma Compliance

  • There was a notable improvement in stoma compliance among patients using essential oils.
  • Specifically, the lavender oil group showed the greatest increase in acceptance and adaptation to living with a stoma.

Discussion

  • The aromatherapy approach using essential oils proved safe and effective without any adverse effects.
  • These natural solutions offer a low-cost, easy-to-use, and non-invasive method to manage stoma-related odor issues.
  • Improved odor control led to greater confidence and comfort , helping patients better integrate into social and professional settings.
  • The results support earlier findings that essential oils like lavender have calming, antibacterial, and deodorizing properties, while peppermint enhances cognitive function and has antimicrobial benefits.

Conclusion

The use of lavender and peppermint essential oils in stoma bags is an effective nursing intervention for:

  • Reducing unpleasant odors
  • Enhancing life satisfaction
  • Improving stoma compliance

These oils represent a simple, natural, and holistic solution that can be integrated into routine stoma care practices to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.


Implications for Practice

  • Nurses and healthcare providers should consider incorporating essential oil applications as part of standard stoma care protocols.
  • Further research could explore long-term usage, optimal dosage, and combinations with other complementary therapies.

Source

Alptekin, D., & Arslan, S. (2024). The effect of different essential oils used in stoma bags of individuals with colostomy removal of odor, life satisfaction and effect on stoma fit: Randomized controlled study. Sustainable Cities and Society , Volume 116.
🔗 ScienceDirect Article 

Carbon Emissions Reductions



  1. Science-Based Approach to Carbon Credits
    The portfolio emphasizes the importance of using scientific standards and expert frameworks to evaluate carbon offset projects.

  2. 7-Step Due Diligence Process
    A structured methodology is used to assess carbon credit projects, ensuring they meet high-quality standards before inclusion in a portfolio.

  3. Aligned with Leading Climate Research Institutions
    The evaluation process draws from methodologies developed by respected organizations such as:

    • Stockholm Environment Institute
    • GHG Management Institute
  4. Use of Multiple Third-Party Rating Agencies
    Projects are assessed using ratings from top independent agencies including:

    • BeZero
    • Calyx Global
    • Renoster
    • Sylvera
      This multi-source approach helps reduce bias and improve accuracy.
  5. Four Pillars of Carbon Credit Quality
    Each project is reviewed based on key criteria that determine the integrity and effectiveness of carbon credits:

    • Additionality : Would the emissions reduction have happened without the project?
    • Over-crediting : Are too many credits being issued relative to actual impact?
    • Durability : How long will the carbon benefit last?
    • Double Counting : Is there risk of the same credit being used more than once?
  6. Ongoing Monitoring & Risk Protection
    Portfolios include mechanisms to monitor project performance over time and mitigate risks like project failure or underperformance.

  7. Transparency and Trust
    Emphasis is placed on clear, data-driven decision-making and combining internal analysis with external verification to build trust in the quality of offsets.



Gaziantep Landfill Gas Project

Oxford Type 1—Emissions Reductions

Katingan Mentaya Project

Oxford Type 2—Conservation

Kootznoowoo Native Community Forestry Project

Oxford Type 4—Nature-based removal

Frontier Carbon Removal Portfolio

Oxford Type 5—Long-lived removal