Monday, December 10, 2012
D-Day for Brooklyn odour offender
A SERIAL offender responsible for the highest number of odour complaints in Brooklyn could be stripped of its operating licence.
The Environment Protection Authority has given Australian Tallow until December 14 to explain why EPA should not suspend its licence.
The company must produce a detailed plan fully outlining improvements to infrastructure, waste and odour management.
An EPA update to the Brooklyn Community Reference Group (BCRG) confirmed Australian Tallow continued to discharge odours in breach of its pollution abatement notice. "Odours have been confirmed and traced to the premises on multiple occasions. Since July this year, the site appears to have regressed somewhat in addressing odour issues at the site."
Last year Australian Tallow was convicted and fined $70,000 over offensive odours and the discharge of animal-derived fat from the Brooklyn rendering facility into Kororoit Creek.
EPA metro manager Richard Marks said most of the businesses in the Brooklyn area were legitimate, but the way they were operating was a real concern. "We've got some major odour issues in the area. Australian Tallow, which is our last major odour source there, is an area of focus for us at the moment."
Possible solution for Timaru’s ongoing odour issue
A solution may be in hand for the nuisance odour which has been a persistent problem for residents of Timaru, particularly during the warm summer months.
Jason Evered Area Leader RMA Compliance Monitoring, based in Timaru, says Environment Canterbury has made it a priority to resolve the problem, but to date, standard approaches to finding the source of the odour have been unsuccessful.
“We hope this new environmental software solution which we are trialling will mean the odours can finally be traced and we can then find a way to eliminate them,’’ he says. “Residents have been suggesting a variety of reasons for the troublesome smell, but it will be good to finally identify the source and do something about it ending the speculation.’’
The EnviroSuite Odour Tracking system operates by modelling local weather in real-time. As soon as a complaint is received, the system runs a “backtrack” from the location of the complaint and shows the path that the odour has travelled.
The system, which has been used successfully to track odour sources in Australia and Spain and can handle a large number of complaints identified from different locations at any one time.
Mr Evered says “Existing equipment is being used for the trial and software is in the process of being installed and we expect it all to be up and running before Christmas.
“To my knowledge this is the first time this system has been used in New Zealand and results should be available soon after the system has been fully installed.
“To really get to the bottom of the problem, we are encouraging all residents to report nuisance odours, making sure they note the location and exact time where and when they smelt the odour, as well as a description of the smell.’’
Residents can phone our Pollution Hotline number 24 hours a day on 0800 76 55 88 and report the time, location and description of the offensive or objectionable odour.
Richmond Review - Foul odour prompts local to gather public feedback
Richmond Review - Foul odour prompts local to gather public feedback
A local resident, fearful that the current effort to eliminate the foul smell linked to Harvest Power's composting facility in East Richmond will linger on for years, is urging Richmond residents to get involved.
"I believe only the community involvement will solve this problem," wrote Patricio Alfaro in an e-mail. "I am writing because I am interested in building awareness of the damage the offensive odour has...to the environment, and to property value."
Alfaro has set up an e-mail address, and is encouraging people upset about the smell to send in e-mails to richmondsmell@gmail.com.
Alfaro hopes to establish a social network whose goal is to eliminate the odour problem.
Alfaro's concerns stem from the experience of residents in London, Ontario, where a waste treatment facility was introduced six years ago.
Alfaro said officials from Orgaworld promised their facility would be "odour free."
"The situation in London, Ont. may be related to a different type of waste processing than Harvest Power, but the passive reaction of the people in a position of solving the odour problem in Richmond is the same as in London," he said. "We hear from the city authorities, from Metro Vancouver, and from Harvest Power management that a solution is in study, giving hope for a return to fresh air again in Richmond and other communities affected."
But Alfaro fears the reality "is that the damaging offensive smell will continue for years to come."
"Promise after promise, the community authorities, the environment authority, and the composting plant have not resolved the problem. The local residents are tired and want the London plant closed for good.
Harvest Power, which is near No. 9 Road and Highway 91 in East Richmond, takes yard and food waste from the city and composts it, turning it into energy.
“We are absolutely committed to dealing with this issue, and given our good record of odour management at the facility going back to the early 1990s, see it as a temporary problem that we can full resolve,” Jeff Leech, regional vice president of Harvest Power, told The Richmond Review last week.
“We are absolutely committed to dealing with this issue, and given our good record of odour management at the facility going back to the early 1990s, see it as a temporary problem that we can full resolve.”
A large part of the problem is expected to be addressed by a new multi-million dollar anaerobic digester that recently came online, and encapsulates the composting process into a closed-air system.
Harvest Power has set up a community hotline to respond to inquiries, comments and complaints at 604-836-8387.
A local resident, fearful that the current effort to eliminate the foul smell linked to Harvest Power's composting facility in East Richmond will linger on for years, is urging Richmond residents to get involved.
"I believe only the community involvement will solve this problem," wrote Patricio Alfaro in an e-mail. "I am writing because I am interested in building awareness of the damage the offensive odour has...to the environment, and to property value."
Alfaro has set up an e-mail address, and is encouraging people upset about the smell to send in e-mails to richmondsmell@gmail.com.
Alfaro hopes to establish a social network whose goal is to eliminate the odour problem.
Alfaro's concerns stem from the experience of residents in London, Ontario, where a waste treatment facility was introduced six years ago.
Alfaro said officials from Orgaworld promised their facility would be "odour free."
"The situation in London, Ont. may be related to a different type of waste processing than Harvest Power, but the passive reaction of the people in a position of solving the odour problem in Richmond is the same as in London," he said. "We hear from the city authorities, from Metro Vancouver, and from Harvest Power management that a solution is in study, giving hope for a return to fresh air again in Richmond and other communities affected."
But Alfaro fears the reality "is that the damaging offensive smell will continue for years to come."
"Promise after promise, the community authorities, the environment authority, and the composting plant have not resolved the problem. The local residents are tired and want the London plant closed for good.
Harvest Power, which is near No. 9 Road and Highway 91 in East Richmond, takes yard and food waste from the city and composts it, turning it into energy.
“We are absolutely committed to dealing with this issue, and given our good record of odour management at the facility going back to the early 1990s, see it as a temporary problem that we can full resolve,” Jeff Leech, regional vice president of Harvest Power, told The Richmond Review last week.
“We are absolutely committed to dealing with this issue, and given our good record of odour management at the facility going back to the early 1990s, see it as a temporary problem that we can full resolve.”
A large part of the problem is expected to be addressed by a new multi-million dollar anaerobic digester that recently came online, and encapsulates the composting process into a closed-air system.
Harvest Power has set up a community hotline to respond to inquiries, comments and complaints at 604-836-8387.
Monday, October 08, 2012
Crying foul over odour claims
ODOUR experts have inspected the site of a proposed chicken farm in the Southern Downs.
Carr Farming Trust has appealed a Southern Downs Regional Council decision in the Planning and Environment Court to establish a poultry farm at Elbow Valley, west of Warwick, with "unreasonable" conditions.
Council approved the chicken facility application but only for 28 chicken sheds, down from the development application request of 48 sheds.
Each shed would house 60,000 chickens at any time, with neighbouring property owners objecting on the grounds of odour, dust, vehicle movements and water contamination issues.
An expert report, tended to the court, on the potential impact of odours to surrounding properties found one property, in particular, would be a "critical receptor" to odours.
The Carr Farming Trust claimed the conditions imposed on their venture were too onerous.
In particular, the trust believed a council-imposed condition the company amalgamate surrounding properties unreasonable.
The matter was listed in the Planning and Environment Court in Brisbane on Friday for an on-site inspection.
Site neighbours had granted permission for officials to use their property during the inspection, court documents show.
According to documents filed to the court, Judge Philip Robin ordered odour experts for council and Carr Farming Trust to finalise another report by 5pm on Friday.
Govt moves to clean up fowl stench
In an effort to deal with the stench and environmental risks from the solid wastes of the poultry sector, Government will embark on a project to clean up and beautify the industry, says Food Production Minister Devant Maharaj.
Maharaj, speaking at a meeting with members of the poultry sector at Marriott Hotel, Invaders Bay, said that the project will approach the Green Fund and other United Nations agencies for financial and technical support.
The Food Production Ministry, he said, through the Agricultural Development Bank and in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources, is conceptualising "Greening of the Poultry Sector".
Maharaj said a comprehensive environmental scan of the sector will be completed to determine the number and location of poultry farms and pluck shops, the number of chickens raised at each farm annually, the total waste produced, an analysis of the poultry litter and where it is spread and a soil analysis of areas where poultry litter is spread.
A clean development mechanism project will be developed, he said, that will treat with the solid waste emitted by the poultry sector.
Additionally, trees will be planted and ventilation systems will be modernised to treat with potential air pollution.
The poultry industry, said Maharaj, has seen phenomenal growth worldwide and in this country the poultry sector accounts for more than 50 per cent of agriculture's contribution to GDP.
Maharaj said over the past decades with the sector's growth there is far more waste that can be managed by land disposal, resulting in environmental problems.
"As you may know, poultry facilities are a source of odour and attract flies, rodents and other pests that create local nuisances and carry disease. Odour emissions from poultry farms adversely affect the life of people living in the vicinity. Odour associated with poultry operations comes from fresh and decomposing waste products such as manure, carcasses, feathers and bedding litter," he said.
On-farm odour, he added, is mainly emitted from poultry buildings, manure and storage facilities.
"Odour from animal feeding operations is not caused by a single compound, but is rather the result of a large number of contributing compounds, including ammonia, volatile organic compounds, and hydrogen sulphide," said Maharaj.
"Although generally not causing any public health concern, odours can represent a strong local problem that is frequently reported by farms' neighbours as the most disturbing environmental impact," the minister added.
Thursday, September 27, 2012
A Mysterious Odour ?
The City of St. John's is aware of a foul odour over the weekend and again today that seems to be emanating from the downtown area and spreading for miles east and west.
But there doesn't seem to be any answers as to where it's coming from.
A city spokeswoman said the manager of St. John's sewage treatment plant at St. John's harbour smelled the odour herself on the weekend and set out to check out the plant's functioning.
However, she said, everything was functioning well at the plant. "It's definitely not coming from there," she said.
The spokeswoman said a further check today with the city's environmental services staff couldn't find any breaks in sewer pipes that could cause such an odour. "So, it doesn't seem to be anything with the city that has caused it," she said.
The harbour does have a unique odour of its own, she said, and the foggy, damp conditions on the weekend could have contributed to it spreading, but that doesn't seem to explain the strong foul odour many people in the city have described as being like raw sewage.
On the weekend, two of the largest cruise ships to ever visit the city were in port around the same time the odour was at its peak.
The spokeswoman checked into how their sewage tanks are emptied and told The Telegram, she was assured they were pumped out by Crosbie Industrial Services trucks after arriving in port.
She said the city has actually made strides in cleaning up St. John's Harbour and its treatment plant has been functioning so well in recent weeks, the city will likely soon provide a public update on the project's overall progress.
In the meantime, city officials are interested in finding the source of the foul odour, but have no idea where it's
coming from.
Monday, July 09, 2012
Surfactant Enhanced In Situ Chemical Oxidation Treatment of Non Aqueous Phase Liquids
Surfactant Enhanced In Situ Chemical Oxidation Treatment of Non Aqueous Phase Liquids
Friday, July 06, 2012
Fragrances ?
PERFUME Creme Brulee 9.J62580 20 kg Packs
50
PERFUME Lemon Splice 1281 20 Lt White Bucket
10
PERFUME Wild Melon 160397 25 kg Packs
10
PERFUME Banana & Coconut 195358 25 kg Packs
50
PERFUME Extrapone 5 UK (660439) 25 kg Packs
86
PERFUME Extrapone Peach 660187 25 Kg Pack
93
PERFUME Fructis Apple 118191 200 Kg Drum
200
PERFUME Innocence – 114636 180 Kg Drum
200
PERFUME Sunshine 6595 Mod 2 20 Kg Pack
10
PERFUME Tropical 3269 Mod 2 50 Kg Pack
30
PERFUME Blue Horizon 2473 20 kg Packs
870
PERFUME Way Out 158007 25 Kg Packs
75.5
FRAG 162395D BATIDINHA
14
FRAG Raging Bull
188
FRAGRANCE AC12511/3 -139938
43
FRAGRANCE COUTURE CHIC E_0784025
12
FRAGRANCE IN PARIS E_0807888
17
PERF BEARHUGS 187193B
180
PERF BELL 6108037
33
PERF LABYRINTH 235905
14
PERF MENS BP 0564K
16
PERF SHAW MUDGE 81541M
10
PERF WS 18362 CHARLIE RED EDT
12
PERFUME CORFU 10200 302
PERFUME ETERNELLE BLEUE G107 33610
17.1
PERFUME 73R-398 (1P703)
20
PERF HYPOROSITE FLEURS 857802
40
PERF LEMON SOAP 30-7222
58
PERF LIMELIFE 132658
37
PERF PINK PETALS 10541
222
PERFUME CARESSING FR272821
42
TRIGGER for SPRAY BOTTLE
26400
TRIGGER 500ML WK BATH FM MESH FOAMER WHITE/RED
5458
TRIGGER 750ML for SPRAY BOTTLE
16950
FRAGRANCE EUCALYPTUS .... 14 x 180 kg
FRAGRANCE APPLE BLEND .... 2 x 180 Kg
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
New plan to beat waste plant stink
A waste plant is planning to double the size of its chimneys to try to get rid of odours upsetting neighbours.
Residents in Farington have been complaining about the stenches coming from Lancashire Waste Technology Park in Sustainability Way, Leyland, for more than a year.
Now bosses at the £320m site, a joint venture between Global Renewables and Lancashire County Council, have applied for planning permission to extend five biofilter exhaust chimney stacks in a bid to tackle the smells.
They reckon increasing the height from 39ft to 82ft will disperse the air better and greatly reduce the odours. They also want to heat waste using a new machine to reduce the pressure on the system they already have
A planning statement, submitted to South Ribble Council, explains: "The primary function of the odour management system installed is to reduce the potential for impact on local residents and their environment.
"Its current configuration is not as effective as originally envisaged and accordingly, the proposed increase in height of the stacks has been
modelled as the most effective and immediate way of ensuring that potential fugitive odour issues can be mitigated to the appropriate levels as originally planned."
Some neighbours reckon the plan will not be enough to tackle the smells, however.
Objector Stephen Oldham, who lives on nearby Bispham Avenue, wrote: "Raising the height of the exhaust stacks will not have any effect on the odour.
"The problem should be solved at its source, with no odour being emitted into the atmosphere. More than doubling the height of the stacks will have an adverse effect on residential property."
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Guidelines for Recycling Plant
RINGWOOD-based business CMA Recycling is being forced to comply with strict operational guidelines following a decision by the Victorian Civil
and Administrative Tribunal last week.
VCAT has ordered Maroondah Council to endorse the management plans developed throughout the tribunal proceedings, including dust, noise and odour regulations.
Council chief executive officer Frank Dixon said the decision was welcomed "as it imposes many, and very detailed, obligations on how CMA must operate its business and how CMA must monitor the impact of its operations on others".
"Clearly council's decision to bring the proceedings was justified and necessary to bring CMA's operations into line," he said.
"While holding CMA to account has consumed significant council and community resources, council remains committed to protecting the amenity and
health and safety of its community."
But the tribunal hearing showed CMA was not entirely in the wrong, with senior member Jeanette Rickards, who presided over the hearing, saying "it
seemed to me that in relation to the management plans neither [the council] nor CMA were very clear as to what they really wanted".
"The plans presented required a considerable amount of work from both sides to ensure that they are effective, enduring and implement a reliable
regime in terms of management, particularly of dust, noise, odour and explosions."
The Weekly recently reported CMA had announced it would be moving the Heatherdale Road shredder within two to three years to a more "suitable"
location.
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Smell you later: The nose knows - and can significantly boost memory of products
Contrary to popular belief, researchers say the true power of scent isn't in affecting our mood — surprisingly, an uncommon occurrence — but rather its capacity to make us linger longer, spend more, recall brands more positively, and greatly improve our memory for products. In fact, a new study shows the latter effect is so potent that it even outshines an advertisement's visuals in terms of boosting brand recall.
"When I first started doing this work, I assumed that if scent had an impact, it would be primarily related to people's moods. But it's actually rare that I find that effect," says Maureen Morrin, a professor of marketing at Rutgers University in New Jersey.
"In my analyses, memory is improved because scent makes people pay closer attention to things. It makes them look longer and process more deeply."
This bears out in a study conducted by Morrin and May Lwin, of Singapore's Nanyang Technological University, using 100 women in a simulated movie-house environment. The cinema was used because it's one of the last strongholds of captive audiences, with consumers being unable to fast-forward through ads and less likely to divert their attention from them.
Participants were shown a spa ad in one of four conditions: scented theatre, ad with pictures; scented theatre, ad with no pictures; unscented theatre, ad with pictures; unscented theatre, ad with no pictures. In the scented condition, a rose-sandalwood combo was used because pre-tests revealed it as an especially pleasant odour to women.
Ad recall was tested five minutes later, and again in two weeks, with a scent strip used to trigger memory. In both cases, scent proved a mighty force.
"When the ad contained pictures as opposed to no pictures, memory went up. If you added a scent, memory went up. And if you had both pictures and a scent, consumers' memories improved by more than those two things added together; that is, one plus one equalled more than two," says Morrin, whose study appears in the Journal of Consumer Behaviour.
"So not only do scent and pictures help memory, when you put them together, they have a super-additive effect."
But don't expect commercials in smellovision anytime soon.
Morrin notes that the cost of installing scent diffusers in theatres is unlikely to be tolerated until studies establish a clear return on investment. She also says there are limitations to its use in large groups because many people have olfactory sensitivity.
The effects of scent on brand recall are so strong, however, that marketers can be expected to leverage them in more practical ways — some of which you may have already experienced.
A handful of Canadian liquor stores, for example, have pumped the aroma of freshly cut grass into beer aisles to evoke cracking a cold one at a BBQ. Last year, Spy Kids 4 was presented in "aroma-scope," with audiences being given scented cards to sniff at different plot points. There are even burger-scented candles designed to remind White Castle patrons of the chain's beefy fare.
"When you're in an environment with a pleasant odour, somehow your brain is telling you that it's a safe place," says Morrin. "It's almost a Darwinian thing."
Indeed. Survival of the fittest wallet.
Sunday, June 03, 2012
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Clean Harbors rejects lawsuit claims
The Clean Harbors hazardous waste facility St. Clair Township operates a landfill and incinerator. CATHY DOBSON/THE OBSERVER/QMI AGENCY
ST. CLAIR TOWNSHIP - As the deadline looms for Clean Harbors to clean up millions of litres of odorous leachate at its hazardous waste site, the company denies causing neighbour Jim Stenton any health problems.
A statement of defence filed in answer to a $25,000 lawsuit from Stenton states that Clean Harbors Canada “acknowledges that odour issues have arisen at the Corunna facility.
“But testing performed by the government would indicate that the odour issues did not present a health issue,” says the statement filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
Stenton, 64, lives within a few kilometres of Clean Harbors’ Telfer Road site. He says that a “putrid” stench from the site woke him numerous times in July 2011 and caused him to leave his home.
His claim describes various health impacts including shortness of breath, headaches, watery eyes, nausea and swelling.
On two occasions, the claim states, 9-1-1 was called when Stenton experienced high blood pressure, nausea, and a headache.
Both parties say they are awaiting a date with a judge for a settlement conference.
However, Stenton said Tuesday he wants to go to trial.
“Unless they come up with an unconditional full settlement, I’m ready to risk court costs and whatever it takes,” he said. “I’ve been fighting this thing off and on for 40 years and they need to clean up their act.”
The Environment Ministry ordered Clean Harbors to remove more than 20 million litres of smelly leachate from its property by Thursday.
“The ministry inspected our facility two weeks ago and we received confirmation that we met all the terms and conditions of their orders ahead of the May 31 deadline,” said Phillip Retallick, senior VP of regulatory affairs for Clean Harbors.
The company spent more than $1 million to incinerate or remove the leachate. About half was destroyed in the on-site incinerator and some was shipped to an U.S.-based commercial hazardous waste injection well.
The rest was captured in two new leachate ponds that have been covered with impervious roofing.
“Right now the working face of the landfill, which had the accumulated leachate, is dry,” Retallick said Tuesday. “We believe these changes we’ve made will mitigate if not eliminate odours.”
Clean Harbors will be “vigilant” in the future to ensure its hazardous waste doesn’t impact the surrounding community,” Retallick added. “We will not let our guard down.”
The storm water management system at the landfill has been improved to ensure processed water and non-processed water doesn’t mix, he said.
The intense odours, which neighbours complained about for about six months, were likely caused by a lot of rainfall over the past three years and a buildup of leachate, Retallick said.
“We were not able to do as good a job controlling the amount of runoff as we should have.”
The MoE’s Kate Jordan confirmed Clean Harbors has complied with the ministry order to reduce and control odour. The order remains in effect and the company is required to continue to report on its incineration schedule, she said.
Despite hot temperatures in May there were no odour complaints related to Clean Harbors from neighbours, Jordan added.
“It looks like they’ve done everything the ministry ordered,” agreed Lori Vokes, spokesperson for several dozen residents who live near the site.
“The neighbours have been telling me there’s been a big improvements in leachate odours there. We’re cautiously optimistic the problem is finally under control,” Vokes said.
“When I look back on it, the million dollar question is why did Clean Harbors and the ministry allow these massive amounts of leachate to accumulate.
“It’s like watching a toxic time bomb and not doing anything about it, just waiting until it goes off to do something.”
Friday, May 25, 2012
Expansion options stink in Chemainus
The Cowichan Valley Regional District is giving to the company operating a composting facility in Chemainus conditional approval to expand.
Coast Environmental Ltd. must choose one of two options if they want to move from accepting strictly sludge, including sewage, brewery and dairy, to also accepting food, fish and garden waste.
Bob McDonald with the CVRD said the first option is to place a six-month moratorium on expanding and then a six-month phasing in of the new system, with the district closely monitoring and measuring the expansion.
But McDonald said the second option, to enclose the entire facility inside a single building, is their preference.
“The hope is that they’ll take that option and this will be the end of concern in the community and odours will be a thing of the past and most people won’t even know they’re operating there.”
Last fall, dozens of residents, including local businessperson Cam Drew, protested the foul smell emanating from the site.
Drew told SunFM News that he doesn't understand why coast Environmental is looking to make their operations even bigger.
“When you’ve been hit with that odour, it offends you so deeply, that it’s just difficult to comprehend how an operator—the problems they’ve had in the past—is given the opportunity to handle even more tonnage, more product.”
Under municipal and provincial bylaws, the CVRD is legally required to let the facility expand if it doesn't impact the people and the surroundings.
Drew agrees with the CVRD’s position that Coast Environmental should choose the option of enclosing the entire composting facility.
The CVRD, in conjunction with North Cowichan, is responsible only for regulating the composting part of the operation, while the sewage transfer section is unregulated.
Residents welcome moves to cut odour
News that the awful smell from a Dubai sewage plant could be virtually eradicated has been welcomed by people who own property nearby - some of whom said the smell is so bad they moved out.
News that the awful smell from a Dubai sewage plant could be virtually eradicated has been welcomed by people who own property nearby - some of whom said the smell is so bad they moved out.
A number of people who own homes in the Persia and Morocco clusters of International City, as well as in nearby Al Warqa, told 7DAYS they have chosen to rent out their homes rather than live in them because of the pong.
The plant’s smell has driven some people away from the area, residents claim
“When I took up my home in Morocco two years ago the stench was awful, especially at night due to the strong winds. I couldn’t even use the balcony,” said Abdul Kadir Rafeeq, a lecturer in Dubai who bought his one-bedroom flat for Dhs300,000.
“Besides the inconvenience, I worried for the health of my two daughters.” Dubai Municipality said on Tuesday it hopes to reduce odour emissions from Al Aweer Sewage Treatment Plant by up to 98 per cent using new treatment processes. It admitted it had received complaints about the problem.
Iranian businessman Behram Khoadad is another homeowner who says he was driven away, this time from the Persia cluster.
And, he said even those he rented his apartment to could not bear it and moved out after about two months.
But, the homeowners said they are looking forward to moving back once the pong is gone.
Mohammed Abdulaziz Najm, director of sewage treatment at the municipality, said studies had been conducted over a number of years to come up with the best solution.
“With more developments approaching the plant, the health of people and safety of the environment have become a major priority,” he said, adding a special task force was formed about six months ago to deal with the problem.
“Through this task force and our improved methods, we have so far attained a 98 per cent reduction in the smell and we have seen a remarkable decline in complaints,” said Rashid Karkain, head of the Al Aweer operation section.
However, some tenants at International City said yesterday they could still smell the plant.
Wednesday, May 02, 2012
Anotec OEM
While many consumers may not be familiar with what an OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer product is, they are becoming more and more common. This is particularly true due to the rise in online shopping. This brief article takes a look at what these OEM products are, their differences with retail products and try to answer if they are things consumers should or should not buy.
What it Means to be an OEM Product
To put an OEM product in the simplest terms, it is a product from a manufacturer that is sold without the retail packaging to system integrators and retailers for purchase in or with a completed computer system. Often they are sold in larger lots or groups to help reduce the costs to the company using the parts for integration. What the OEM product will come with will vary depending upon the type of product being sold.
So, how does the product vary? Typically the component that is purchased as an OEM product lacks all retail packaging. Also missing might be cables or software that may have been included with the retail version. Finally, there may be no or reduced instructions included with the OEM version of the product.
A good example of these differences can be seen between an OEM and retail hard drive. The retail version is often referred to as a kit because it includes with it the drive cables, installation instructions, warranty cards and any software packages used to help configure or run the drive. The OEM version of the drive will only include the hard drive in a sealed anti-static bag with no other materials. Sometimes this will be referred to as a "bare drive".
Retail vs. OEM
Since price is such a huge factor in the purchase of product by consumers, OEM products offer a major advantage over a retail product. The reduced items and packaging can drastically reduce the cost of a computer component over a retail version. This leads to the question as to why anyone would chose to purchase the retail version.
The biggest difference between a retail and OEM product is how warranties are handled. Most retail products come with very well defined terms for service and support in case the product has any problems. OEM products on the other hand will generally have shorter warranties and limited support. The reason is that the OEM product is supposed to be sold as part of a package via a retailer. Therefore, all service and support for the component in the system should be handled by the retailer if sold in a complete system.
As a user who is building a computer system or upgrading a computer system, the retail version may also be important. If you are unfamiliar with what is required to install the component into the computer system, the manufacturer instructions can be very useful as are any cables that you may not have.
OEM Software
Like hardware, software can also be purchased as OEM. OEM software is identical to the full retail versions of the software but it lacks any packaging. Typically this will be seen with software items such as operating systems and office suites. Unlike OEM hardware, there are more restrictions on what will allow the software to be sold by a retailer to a consumer.
OEM software typically can only be purchased with a complete computer system. Some retailers will allow the purchase of the software if it is also purchased with some form of core computer system hardware. In either case, there must be some additional purchase of hardware to go along with the OEM software. Be careful though, a number of unscrupulous retailers and individuals sell OEM software that is actually pirated software, so check the retailer before purchasing.
Determining OEM or Retail
When shopping for computer components, sometimes it may not be obvious if the item is an OEM or a retail version. Most reputable retailers will list the product as either "OEM" or "bare drive". Other items to look for would be in the product description. Items such as "Packaging" and "Warranty" can provide clues as to whether it is an OEM version.
The biggest problem comes with the various pricing engines on the web. If a manufacturer uses the same product designation for an OEM and retail product, it is possible that retailers on the results page could be offering either version. Some pricing engines will list "OEM" next to the price, but others may not. Always read the product description if you are not sure.
Are OEM Products OK?
There should be no physical difference in a component if it is sold as OEM or in retail. The difference is the extras that are provided with the retail version. If you are comfortable with the terms of the OEM product compared to the retail version, then it is generally better to buy the OEM product for the reduced cost. If items such as product warranties bother you, purchase the retail versions for the peace of mind they provide.
Monday, April 30, 2012
Kingston Council and EPA smell a win - Council - News - Moorabbin Leader
Kingston Council and EPA smell a win - Council - News - Moorabbin Leader: "KINGSTON Council and the EPA are gearing up for a fight at VCAT to close a Clayton South tip site.
Transpacific Industries will appeal on April 30 against the council’s refusal to extend its landfill operations at the Fraser Rd site by another 10 years.
A spokeswoman for the company, Carla Young, declined to comment pending the legal proceedings.
But nearby residents are venting their frustrations on Leader’s Facebook page, Stop the Stink: Make Kingston odour free ."
'via Blog this'
Transpacific Industries will appeal on April 30 against the council’s refusal to extend its landfill operations at the Fraser Rd site by another 10 years.
A spokeswoman for the company, Carla Young, declined to comment pending the legal proceedings.
But nearby residents are venting their frustrations on Leader’s Facebook page, Stop the Stink: Make Kingston odour free ."
'via Blog this'
Thursday, April 19, 2012
What Is That 'Old Books Smell'? Chemistry Has Answers - Kasia Cieplak-Mayr von Baldegg - Video - The Atlantic
What Is That 'Old Books Smell'? Chemistry Has Answers - Kasia Cieplak-Mayr von Baldegg - Video - The Atlantic: "Based on research by scientists at University College, London, a video from AbeBooks explains the causes of the characteristic odor of old books. According to the video, the lead scientist on the study described it as a "combination of grassy notes with a tang of acids and a hint of vanilla over an underlying mustiness."
"
'via Blog this'
"
'via Blog this'
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Ministry says Monday’s smells weren’t from compost plant
GUELPH — The municipal organics plant on the city’s south-east side has been cleared as the source of two odour complaints, city councillor Ian Findlay has announced.
“In my mind, I think that ends it,” Findlay said Wednesday.
The provincial Ministry of the Environment was informed by two residents near the Dunlop Drive composting plant Monday morning of odour problems. It launched an investigation along with municipal solid waste staff.
They concluded, as Findlay reported on his blog, that data on prevailing winds that morning indicated the air from the plant was moving away from the residents, not toward them.
It suggested the plant wasn’t the source.
Findlay said at this time of year it wouldn’t be improbable to have various unknown scents in the air, such as fertilizers on nearby agricultural fields. He was unaware of other public complaints in recent months, he added.
The facility temporarily stopped accepting new waste last November after about 10 pungent odour complaints were lodged by neighbours. The city has monitored operations to reduce the risk of stenches emanating from there.
“I’m always afraid of those odours popping up. I don’t think they can make it odour-free,” vocal plant critic Ken Spira said Wednesday. He’s president of the community action group Guelph Waste Management Coalition.
Bob Crashley, who lives on Glenholm Drive near the plant, said Wednesday there was indeed an odour in the air Monday but hard to source.
“I could smell something in the air, but I wouldn’t attribute it to the plant,” Crashley said, concluding it had more of a chemical smell than one of rotting waste.
One of the MOE complainants, in a report, described it as a compost or gas odour detectable shortly before 9 a.m. Monday on Glenholm.
A second at that time and place compared it as a garbage-like smell.
anotec simple straightforward without confusion
anotec simple straightforward without confusion
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
Neighbours complain about Darwen brewery's acrid odours
AN award-winning micro-brewery looks set to continue production in Darwen despite a neighbour’s complaints over ‘acrid’ odours.
Hopstar Brewery set up in a new industrial unit at Rinus Business Park, in Grimshaw Street, Darwen, in July 2010.
A year later Owen Taylor, who runs Tower Signs in a neighbouring unit, complained of headaches and nausea as a result of odours produced during brewing.
Subsequently, Hopstar managing director, Natalie Tyson, said work had been carried out to prevent odours from passing into other units.
And in an attempt to satisfy her neighbour, she has sent a retrospective plans to Blackburn with Darwen Council, requesting a change of use to a micro-brewery.
The application, which will be discussed by the borough’s Planning and Highways Committee next week, includes a letter of objection from Mr Taylor.
It says: “At certain stages of the brewing process, odours are produced.
“I would describe this odour as a strong, malty, acrid smell.”
Mr Taylor said the odours got into neighbouring premises through cavities in exterior walls.
He said: “The odours passing into adjacent properties cause negative effects to the health of staff members exposed to the odours for a long period of time.
“I personally suffer headaches and nausea as a result of this.
“The odours can cause damage to stock such as garments and any paper-based materials, which readily absorb smells.”
According to Mr Taylor, the odours often find their way into customers’ cars, which are stored overnight at his premises.
Hopstar was started by Barry Tyson in the garage of his home in Pope Lane in 2004. Its ales have won a number of industry awards.
Miss Tyson said: “When we signed the lease we were under the impression that we had permission for a micro-brewery, so we started out.
“We have been told that we probably don’t need to submit these plans, but we wanted to keep our neighbours happy.
“We are on an industrial estate and we have done everything we can.
“We have sealed up all the gaps and cavity and installed a special condenser that turns steam into water, so hopefully the application will go through.”
The Planning and Highways Committee will meet at Blackburn Town Hall, at 6.30pm on Thursday (15).
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Odours are a thing of the past
Odours Are now a thing of the past. Due to odour control .
The ramp-up will be gradual in order to verify that the air containment and odour management systems are functioning properly, but she expects the facility will return to full-scale operations by April.
Not long after opening the new composting facility last year, it was shut down after neighbours in the area complained of foul odours coming from the plant.
Anotec reviewed the air containment and odour management systems, and with input from a residence, devised an action plan to resolve the odour issues.
Most recently, odour control systems were to be installed on the acid waste tank in the air containment system. And rather than using automated sensors, now staff will use hand-held absorption tubes several times a day to measure odour levels. As well, a modified scrubber/humidifier will operate using pH levels rather than ammonia levels.
Anotec will also design and install a permanent connection between the blower room and the odour management system, which should prevent any odours from escaping.
The plant began operations in early 2007 on the site where a previous composting plant had operated. That plant was the subject of several odour complaints until it was closed in the spring of 2006.
The new facility cost about $39 million to build.
Wednesday, February 01, 2012
Anotec
Anotec was appointed to design, manufacture, install and commission remediation equipment for the remediation of a former gas work site.
The remediation equipment comprised the following main components:
·Water treatment system for dewatering of excavations . Engineered odour control canopy to allow excavation of odoriferous contaminated soils from a tar pit.
Closed loop pump and treat system for odorous aqueous liquids from dewatering and tar tanks.
Actively aerated biopile system for ex-situ remediation of soil.
Anotec manufactured the various remediation systems in-house and modified existing equipment to suit site requirements. Mobilisation to site was achieved within 1 week of instruction and the dewatering, water treatment system and closed loop pump and treat system were fully operational within 20 working days.
All diffuse odour emissions from the water treatment system were captured and treated in a dedicated air filtration system, to avoid escape of odours to nearby housing estate. All vacuum pumps extraction blowers/fans were housed within acoustically enclosed containers to minimise the risk of noise impact to nearby residents.
Upon commencement of excavation works, actively aerated biopile systems were set up together with ancillaries and extraction pipework. The biopiles were designed to allow flexible operation to accommodate a staged soil excavation programme, thus facilitating rapid turn-around of treated soils for backfill operations.
Air emissions and liquid effluents were treated using a Granular Activated Carbon filtration system prior to discharge. The Granular Activated Carbon filters were sized and designed to allow prolonged treatment with the minimum number of changes of media in order to minimise impact on site operations.
Anotec's engineers undertook regular operational system checks and visits to ensure continued operation of remediation equipment.
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Making a big stink about odours
Mike Holmes investigates the source of bad smells in a house, and advises homeowners not to ignore them.
You need to put all your senses to work to make your home safe and healthy. That means using your nose to sniff out problems, as well as your eyes to see what’s wrong.
I’m not just talking about noticing and avoiding volatile organic compounds when you smell them (that’s those chemicals in many building products, which evaporate quickly and can sicken some people who smell them). I’m talking about training your nose to recognize dangerous odours that warn of potentially lethal outcomes, such as a natural gas leak, an electrical fire or septic gas.
All these hazards can kill, and they all have a specific odour you’ll probably smell before you see anything. But that’s only if you know the scent when you come across it.
Leaking natural gas, for instance, can smell something like a dead mouse or skunk. Utilities add that unpleasant odour to naturally odourless and colourless gas for the purpose of warning you when it escapes. Ignoring the warning smell and flipping a light switch can cause a spark that ignites the house. Turn off the gas source. Leave the house and call the utility company.
Rotten-egg smell is a symptom of both septic gas, which leaks in through the plumbing, and toxic drywall, which off-gasses hydrogen sulphide. If the house has been vacant for a while, dried-out traps might be letting in septic gas, which is lethal in large doses. If running water through the system doesn’t eliminate the smell, call a plumber. Once plumbing gets ruled out as the source and the smell persists, you could have a worse problem with that bad drywall, which can short electric systems and make you sick. It was imported to North America from 2001 to 2007, so some homes still have it. It must be professionally removed.
Don’t write off a strong urine smell as a pet accident. Accompanied by a stain on a bedroom ceiling, it could also mean a raccoon infestation in the attic. In some cases, it’s a red flag the house might have been used as a lab to make methamphetamine, an illegal synthetic drug. Residue can cause breathing problems, similar to an overgrowth of mould. Decontamination can cost thousands of dollars.
Never ignore a burning smell, either, especially one that’s like burning rubber. Your nose is telling you an appliance or outlet is dangerously overheated, which can lead to a fire. Turning off the circuit you think is causing the problem at the breaker box is a smart first response, before you phone an electrician. But leave the house if you see flames.
Ever catch a whiff of something you can only describe as mushrooms? In an older home, especially where the wood framing wasn’t pressure-treated as it is now, it could be dry rot, a fungus that sucks the structural strength out of healthy timber. To get rid of it, you’ll need a good mould remediator who knows dry rot.
Why am I making a big stink about odours? Probably because so many homeowners ignore or tolerate bad smells, until it’s too late. They never guess it’s affecting their health or, worse, signalling real physical danger brewing behind the walls.
You can’t count on inspectors to identify bad odours unless they actually see evidence of a problem. They’re typically not trained to address a bad smell on its own; it’s categorized as “environmental” and not part of their visual evaluation. A good one, however, won’t ignore smells that, in their experience, are linked to a broader problem.
Some inspectors use dogs specially trained to sniff out mould. Just the way dogs are able to detect drugs, they can smell dangerous mould spores that can affect your indoor air quality and family’s health.
As basic as it may sound, it pays to educate yourself about smells that spell danger. Then you’ll be able to react quickly and call the right professional before things get out of hand.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)