A foul scent yesterday led hundreds of South Jersey residents to call police. The reports peaked about 9 a.m., dispatchers said. Some callers reported a natural gas leak or the scent of burning acid.
The stench seemed to be most concentrated in central Gloucester County, but it was noticed as far away as Asbury Park and parts of Ocean County, a state police spokesman said.
Petroleum refineries line the Delaware River in northern Gloucester County. A spokeswoman for Valero Refining Co. said published reports linking Valero's East Greenwich Township facility to the smell were unfounded. A "glitch" at the plant Thursday afternoon released higher-than-usual amounts of sulfur into the air, said spokeswoman Claire Riggs, but the release was within "acceptable limits" and was not noticed in the immediate vicinity.
Air testing over a wide area found no evidence indicating the odor might be harmful, said state police spokesman Sgt. Stephen Jones. Local police and the state Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness were investigating the odor, along with state troopers and county offices of emergency management. - Sam Wood
Saturday, January 05, 2008
Thursday, January 03, 2008
What’s that smell? Hog farms are ruining their way of life
Since 2000, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources has received more than 1,700 odor complaints against concentrated animal feeding operations, according to a Missourian analysis of records held by the state agency. Missouri is home to 450 of these operations, including 21 large enough to have their odors regulated.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Tuesday, January 01, 2008
Piggery odour management
Environmental Scientists, Engineers and Extension Officers, Delivery
Introduction
Odour is one of the most contentious issues facing piggery producers. Pig farms generate odours that the surrounding community may find offensive.
Odours from a piggery are a complex issue involving processes within the piggery, effluent collection and storage, carcass disposal and manure spreading.
The factors that contribute to the impact of an odour nuisance on a recipient include the frequency (F) of occurrence of odour impact, the intensity (I) or strength of the odour, the duration (D) of exposure and the offensiveness (O) or character of the odour (Artis 1984; Bulley and Phillips 1980). These terms are collectively described as the FIDO factors.
The rate at which an odour is generated is influenced by shed design, effluent collection and disposal systems, and overall piggery management. The impact of generated odours is influenced by the climate and topography. Location, design and good management practices aim to prevent odour problems at nearby residences.
Odour generation
The odour generated from piggeries is a result of the decomposition of manure and waste food. Odour from freshly excreted manure is generally less offensive than odour released from anaerobically decomposing manure.
Decomposition of piggery wastes may occur either anaerobically or aerobically. The compounds produced depend on the oxygen status of the waste and, thus, the process involved in the decomposition.
Aerobic decomposition occurs under conditions where oxygen is available in the system. Under aerobic conditions, the main decomposition by-products are carbon dioxide, water and other compounds (e.g. water soluble, inorganic nitrogen and sulphur based compounds), which tend to produce little odour (Elliot et al 1978).
Anaerobic decomposition occurs where there is little or no oxygen available to the system. Anaerobic decomposition is a slower and less complete process than aerobic decomposition. Because anaerobic digestion is less complete, the by-products yielded are more complex and subsequently tend to be more odorous (Elliot et al 1978). Some of the by-products of anaerobic digestion, such as volatile fatty acids, phenols and hydrogen sulphide, produce strong odours that may be detected a significant distance from the source (Elliot et al 1978). Other compounds released are odourless (e.g. methane).
Odour dispersion
When air transports an odour from the source, dispersion or dilution of the odour occurs. This results in a declining odour concentration with increasing distance downwind of the source. This reduction in odour concentration depends on the atmospheric stability at the time.
Generally, odour does not disperse and mix as readily at night as it does during the day. Atmospheric stability refers to the potential of air to disperse and is defined using Pasquill Gifford scheme where the atmosphere is categorised from unstable (category A) to stable (category F). Optimum dispersion occurs under unstable conditions. In simple terms, the lower the stability class (closer to A), the greater the odour dispersion and, hence, the lower the potential for odour nuisance (see Table 1).
Separation distance plays an important role in the dispersion of odours from piggeries. Piggeries should be established a sufficient distance from sensitive receptors, such as farm residences and towns, to ensure that dispersion effectively limits odours to acceptable levels and frequencies under the expected range of atmospheric conditions. Under some circumstances, computer modelling of odour dispersion may be required to support an application for a new or expanding piggery development. (For more information, please refer to Separation guidelines for Queensland piggeries , or telephone 07 4688 1305).
Odour sources and management practices to reduce odour generation
Sheds
Modern piggery sheds generally produce less odour than older styles of piggery sheds. This is primarily due to improved natural ventilation, better construction materials that are easy to clean, and the use of flushing pits, rather than static pits.
Management practices that may reduce odour generation in sheds include:
Regular cleaning/sweeping and water pressure washing of lanes, pens and handling areas when required.
Flushed sheds should be flushed twice daily.
Static pit sheds should be dumped weekly, or more frequently if possible.
The cycle of pit flushing or emptying should ensure complete cleaning of the pit.
The use of recycled effluent liquid to top-up static systems and in flushed sheds can reduce total effluent and odour production.
Bactericides used in piggery disinfection should be minimised to avoid detrimental affects on pond flora and fauna.
Deep litter sheds should always be provided with sufficient bedding material to avoid the formation of wet areas.
Drains
Well maintained, adequately designed drains should not create odour problems. Odour control emissions from drains occur when wet manure accumulates in the drain and decomposes anaerobically.
Drains should be constructed of smooth concrete, fibreglass or other impervious material in spoon or vee channel sections.
They should have a minimum 0.5% slope to ensure non-retention of solids, ease of cleaning and drying between use.
Enclosed drains/pipes should have 1% slope and should be flushed with sufficient fluid to self clean.
Ponds
Anaerobic ponds are an effective method for treating piggery waste. If they are designed and managed correctly, odour generation can be minimised, resulting in fewer odour complaints. The importance, however, of designing and managing ponds correctly cannot be over-emphasised as recent research has shown that they are the major source of odour at Australian piggeries.
Effluent loading needs to be even and must not exceed the design capacity of the pond system.
Effluent release from sheds to ponds should be staged to avoid slug or shock loading.
Pond active volume should be maintained by regular and planned desludging.
Excess pond salinisation should be avoided by the addition of fresh water.
Pond pH should be maintained between 6.8 and 8.0.
Afterbirth, pig carcasses and foreign material should not be disposed of in ponds.
Covering ponds with supported straw and permeable polypropylene has been shown to reduce odour emissions from anaerobic ponds by up to 90%. This is a relatively new technology in Australia and is currently being researched.
Impermeable pond covers can also be used to eliminate odour emissions from anaerobic ponds. While such systems can be quite costly, biogas from the ponds can be flared or converted to thermal or electric energy.
Effluent disposal areas
Irrigation of effluent generates odours through the release of offensive gases and by spray drift of fine aerosols through the atmosphere.
The application or irrigation of piggery effluent should be managed so that effluent infiltrates, or is incorporated into the soil soon after application.
Surface ponding should be avoided, as should effluent irrigation during prolonged wet periods or when runoff would occur following further irrigation.
Timing of effluent application should be considered, including time of day or week (e.g. consider weekends and public holidays), prevailing weather conditions, and working conditions of the pond.
Neighbours should be consulted when management practices are likely to cause excessive odour emission.
Carcass disposal
Odour generation may be significant in poorly designed and managed disposal facilities.
Pits should be designed to prevent entry of upslope runoff water.
The whole carcass should be covered with a layer of soil immediately after placement in the pit.
If composting is used, the carcass should be covered with at least 300 mm of sawdust or other composting substrate.
Pond desludging
Sludge is comprised of either completely or partially digested organic matter, which settles out in the anaerobic pond. When sludge is removed from the pond, all of the solids are disturbed and, thus, desludging can be highly odorous.
As desludging is an infrequent, but unavoidable, event, neighbours should be informed of the impending operation.
Suggested management practices
The measurement of odour generation rate and odour intensity is a developing science. The technology for odour measurement is not suitable for real-time piggery management or regulation. However, it is widely recognised that good design, construction and management practices can minimise excessive odour emissions. Consequently, the following management practices are suggested:
Avoid excessive manure build up in piggery buildings and below floor pit areas.
Ensure that external open drains are impervious, with non-earthen base and sides that are kept clean and dry between use.
Manage ponds to ensure minimal crusting and an even effluent loading that does not exceed the design capacity of the pond system.
Where practical, incorporate piggery solids (sludge and screenings) into the soil within 24 hours of spreading.
Manage and site manure storage and processing areas to avoid odour nuisances.
Advise neighbours in advance of any management practices that may lead to odour nuisances.
Other methods of reducing odour complaints
The adage ‘out of site - out of mind’ holds true for piggeries. The planting of trees around existing piggeries or siting new piggeries in a wooded area will make them less obvious to the public and, generally, reduce the incidence of odour complaints. Properly planted tree buffers also have the potential to enhance odour dispersion, thereby reducing odour nuisance.
It is also advisable to set up lines of communication with neighbours. Many odour complaints arise from disagreements and misunderstanding.
Complaint recording and investigation
As part of a piggery operator’s Environmental management plan, a register should be kept of all odour complaints. This register should include time, duration of the event, meteorological conditions (temperature, humidity, wind speed, wind direction) and any changed management or operational practices at the time.
Record the cause of the odour (if known) and any remedial action taken to rectify the problem.
References
Artis, D 1984, ‘Legal controls over odour nuisance’, Chemistry and Industry, 9:320.
Bulley, NR and Phillips, D 1980, ‘Sensory evaluation of agricultural odours: A critical review’, Can. Agric Eng. 22:107-112.
Elliot, LF, Doran, JW and Travis, TA 1978, ‘A Review of Analytical Methods for Detecting and Measuring Malodors’. Soil Sci. Soc.
Pasquill, F and Smith, FB 1983, Atmospheric Diffusion. Chichester, Ellis Horwood.
Further information
Environmental code of practice for Queensland piggeries, which is available from DPI&F’s Shop: visit www.dpi.qld.gov.au/shop or telephone 1800 816 541.
DPI&F website http://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/
DPI&F Call Centre open from 8.00am to 6.00pm Monday to Friday (telephone 13 25 23 for the cost of a local call within Queensland; interstate callers 07 3404 6999) or email callweb@dpi.qld.gov.au
http://www2.dpi.qld.gov.au/environment/13772.html
Introduction
Odour is one of the most contentious issues facing piggery producers. Pig farms generate odours that the surrounding community may find offensive.
Odours from a piggery are a complex issue involving processes within the piggery, effluent collection and storage, carcass disposal and manure spreading.
The factors that contribute to the impact of an odour nuisance on a recipient include the frequency (F) of occurrence of odour impact, the intensity (I) or strength of the odour, the duration (D) of exposure and the offensiveness (O) or character of the odour (Artis 1984; Bulley and Phillips 1980). These terms are collectively described as the FIDO factors.
The rate at which an odour is generated is influenced by shed design, effluent collection and disposal systems, and overall piggery management. The impact of generated odours is influenced by the climate and topography. Location, design and good management practices aim to prevent odour problems at nearby residences.
Odour generation
The odour generated from piggeries is a result of the decomposition of manure and waste food. Odour from freshly excreted manure is generally less offensive than odour released from anaerobically decomposing manure.
Decomposition of piggery wastes may occur either anaerobically or aerobically. The compounds produced depend on the oxygen status of the waste and, thus, the process involved in the decomposition.
Aerobic decomposition occurs under conditions where oxygen is available in the system. Under aerobic conditions, the main decomposition by-products are carbon dioxide, water and other compounds (e.g. water soluble, inorganic nitrogen and sulphur based compounds), which tend to produce little odour (Elliot et al 1978).
Anaerobic decomposition occurs where there is little or no oxygen available to the system. Anaerobic decomposition is a slower and less complete process than aerobic decomposition. Because anaerobic digestion is less complete, the by-products yielded are more complex and subsequently tend to be more odorous (Elliot et al 1978). Some of the by-products of anaerobic digestion, such as volatile fatty acids, phenols and hydrogen sulphide, produce strong odours that may be detected a significant distance from the source (Elliot et al 1978). Other compounds released are odourless (e.g. methane).
Odour dispersion
When air transports an odour from the source, dispersion or dilution of the odour occurs. This results in a declining odour concentration with increasing distance downwind of the source. This reduction in odour concentration depends on the atmospheric stability at the time.
Generally, odour does not disperse and mix as readily at night as it does during the day. Atmospheric stability refers to the potential of air to disperse and is defined using Pasquill Gifford scheme where the atmosphere is categorised from unstable (category A) to stable (category F). Optimum dispersion occurs under unstable conditions. In simple terms, the lower the stability class (closer to A), the greater the odour dispersion and, hence, the lower the potential for odour nuisance (see Table 1).
Separation distance plays an important role in the dispersion of odours from piggeries. Piggeries should be established a sufficient distance from sensitive receptors, such as farm residences and towns, to ensure that dispersion effectively limits odours to acceptable levels and frequencies under the expected range of atmospheric conditions. Under some circumstances, computer modelling of odour dispersion may be required to support an application for a new or expanding piggery development. (For more information, please refer to Separation guidelines for Queensland piggeries , or telephone 07 4688 1305).
Odour sources and management practices to reduce odour generation
Sheds
Modern piggery sheds generally produce less odour than older styles of piggery sheds. This is primarily due to improved natural ventilation, better construction materials that are easy to clean, and the use of flushing pits, rather than static pits.
Management practices that may reduce odour generation in sheds include:
Regular cleaning/sweeping and water pressure washing of lanes, pens and handling areas when required.
Flushed sheds should be flushed twice daily.
Static pit sheds should be dumped weekly, or more frequently if possible.
The cycle of pit flushing or emptying should ensure complete cleaning of the pit.
The use of recycled effluent liquid to top-up static systems and in flushed sheds can reduce total effluent and odour production.
Bactericides used in piggery disinfection should be minimised to avoid detrimental affects on pond flora and fauna.
Deep litter sheds should always be provided with sufficient bedding material to avoid the formation of wet areas.
Drains
Well maintained, adequately designed drains should not create odour problems. Odour control emissions from drains occur when wet manure accumulates in the drain and decomposes anaerobically.
Drains should be constructed of smooth concrete, fibreglass or other impervious material in spoon or vee channel sections.
They should have a minimum 0.5% slope to ensure non-retention of solids, ease of cleaning and drying between use.
Enclosed drains/pipes should have 1% slope and should be flushed with sufficient fluid to self clean.
Ponds
Anaerobic ponds are an effective method for treating piggery waste. If they are designed and managed correctly, odour generation can be minimised, resulting in fewer odour complaints. The importance, however, of designing and managing ponds correctly cannot be over-emphasised as recent research has shown that they are the major source of odour at Australian piggeries.
Effluent loading needs to be even and must not exceed the design capacity of the pond system.
Effluent release from sheds to ponds should be staged to avoid slug or shock loading.
Pond active volume should be maintained by regular and planned desludging.
Excess pond salinisation should be avoided by the addition of fresh water.
Pond pH should be maintained between 6.8 and 8.0.
Afterbirth, pig carcasses and foreign material should not be disposed of in ponds.
Covering ponds with supported straw and permeable polypropylene has been shown to reduce odour emissions from anaerobic ponds by up to 90%. This is a relatively new technology in Australia and is currently being researched.
Impermeable pond covers can also be used to eliminate odour emissions from anaerobic ponds. While such systems can be quite costly, biogas from the ponds can be flared or converted to thermal or electric energy.
Effluent disposal areas
Irrigation of effluent generates odours through the release of offensive gases and by spray drift of fine aerosols through the atmosphere.
The application or irrigation of piggery effluent should be managed so that effluent infiltrates, or is incorporated into the soil soon after application.
Surface ponding should be avoided, as should effluent irrigation during prolonged wet periods or when runoff would occur following further irrigation.
Timing of effluent application should be considered, including time of day or week (e.g. consider weekends and public holidays), prevailing weather conditions, and working conditions of the pond.
Neighbours should be consulted when management practices are likely to cause excessive odour emission.
Carcass disposal
Odour generation may be significant in poorly designed and managed disposal facilities.
Pits should be designed to prevent entry of upslope runoff water.
The whole carcass should be covered with a layer of soil immediately after placement in the pit.
If composting is used, the carcass should be covered with at least 300 mm of sawdust or other composting substrate.
Pond desludging
Sludge is comprised of either completely or partially digested organic matter, which settles out in the anaerobic pond. When sludge is removed from the pond, all of the solids are disturbed and, thus, desludging can be highly odorous.
As desludging is an infrequent, but unavoidable, event, neighbours should be informed of the impending operation.
Suggested management practices
The measurement of odour generation rate and odour intensity is a developing science. The technology for odour measurement is not suitable for real-time piggery management or regulation. However, it is widely recognised that good design, construction and management practices can minimise excessive odour emissions. Consequently, the following management practices are suggested:
Avoid excessive manure build up in piggery buildings and below floor pit areas.
Ensure that external open drains are impervious, with non-earthen base and sides that are kept clean and dry between use.
Manage ponds to ensure minimal crusting and an even effluent loading that does not exceed the design capacity of the pond system.
Where practical, incorporate piggery solids (sludge and screenings) into the soil within 24 hours of spreading.
Manage and site manure storage and processing areas to avoid odour nuisances.
Advise neighbours in advance of any management practices that may lead to odour nuisances.
Other methods of reducing odour complaints
The adage ‘out of site - out of mind’ holds true for piggeries. The planting of trees around existing piggeries or siting new piggeries in a wooded area will make them less obvious to the public and, generally, reduce the incidence of odour complaints. Properly planted tree buffers also have the potential to enhance odour dispersion, thereby reducing odour nuisance.
It is also advisable to set up lines of communication with neighbours. Many odour complaints arise from disagreements and misunderstanding.
Complaint recording and investigation
As part of a piggery operator’s Environmental management plan, a register should be kept of all odour complaints. This register should include time, duration of the event, meteorological conditions (temperature, humidity, wind speed, wind direction) and any changed management or operational practices at the time.
Record the cause of the odour (if known) and any remedial action taken to rectify the problem.
References
Artis, D 1984, ‘Legal controls over odour nuisance’, Chemistry and Industry, 9:320.
Bulley, NR and Phillips, D 1980, ‘Sensory evaluation of agricultural odours: A critical review’, Can. Agric Eng. 22:107-112.
Elliot, LF, Doran, JW and Travis, TA 1978, ‘A Review of Analytical Methods for Detecting and Measuring Malodors’. Soil Sci. Soc.
Pasquill, F and Smith, FB 1983, Atmospheric Diffusion. Chichester, Ellis Horwood.
Further information
Environmental code of practice for Queensland piggeries, which is available from DPI&F’s Shop: visit www.dpi.qld.gov.au/shop or telephone 1800 816 541.
DPI&F website http://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/
DPI&F Call Centre open from 8.00am to 6.00pm Monday to Friday (telephone 13 25 23 for the cost of a local call within Queensland; interstate callers 07 3404 6999) or email callweb@dpi.qld.gov.au
http://www2.dpi.qld.gov.au/environment/13772.html
Previous Research Projects on Odours
Recommendation of remedial measures to reduce poultry odour emissions ... - www.odour.unsw.edu.au/previous-proj..
The effect of Volcanic air pollution on health.
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673600035868
Sunday, December 30, 2007
Friday, December 21, 2007
Wade: Odor's solution comes at a cost
By John Ramsey
Staff writer
ADVERTISEMENT
The rancid odor in Wade is gone, but the debate over who should pay for the fix remains.
Stagnant sewage in the town’s pipes produced hydrogen sulfide, which created a rotten-egg stench in much of the town for more than a year.
Last month, Cumberland County started pouring a chemical in the pipes that prevents the smelly bacteria from forming in the pipes.
“I really haven’t noticed it all that much since then,” said Shearin McPhail, who lives across from the town’s sewage lift station. McPhail said last month that the smell was strong enough to make him nauseous.
A sewer system for Wade, Godwin and Falcon — called Norcress — was finished in the fall of 2005. Wastewater from Godwin and Falcon converge in Wade.
A lack of customers to flush the pipes means raw sewage sits in them for days at a time, said Tom Cooney, Cumberland County’s public utilities director.
The engineer, Kevin Lindsay of Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, failed to consider the low usage when designing the project, Cooney said.
Lindsay said he wouldn’t have done anything differently in hindsight. The only design solution would have been installing smaller pipes, and that would restrict the towns’ possibility for future growth, he said. He attributed the odor to a combination of stagnant sewage in the lines and the waste coming from a meat-processing plant in Falcon.
The new chemical additive, which costs about $1,300 a month, has drastically reduced hydrogen sulfide output.
The county believes the Public Works Commission should cover the costs because of a maintenance agreement that calls for PWC to maintain pumping stations and chemicals associated with operation.
The PWC argues that the chemical to stop the stink is not associated with operation.
Legal teams for the county and the PWC are still discussing the issue.
If the county has to pay for the chemicals, which will be added indefinitely, the roughly 500 customers of the Norcress system will likely see about a $2 increase on their monthly bills.
Staff writer John Ramsey can be reached at ramseyj@fayobserver.com or 486-3574.
Staff writer
ADVERTISEMENT
The rancid odor in Wade is gone, but the debate over who should pay for the fix remains.
Stagnant sewage in the town’s pipes produced hydrogen sulfide, which created a rotten-egg stench in much of the town for more than a year.
Last month, Cumberland County started pouring a chemical in the pipes that prevents the smelly bacteria from forming in the pipes.
“I really haven’t noticed it all that much since then,” said Shearin McPhail, who lives across from the town’s sewage lift station. McPhail said last month that the smell was strong enough to make him nauseous.
A sewer system for Wade, Godwin and Falcon — called Norcress — was finished in the fall of 2005. Wastewater from Godwin and Falcon converge in Wade.
A lack of customers to flush the pipes means raw sewage sits in them for days at a time, said Tom Cooney, Cumberland County’s public utilities director.
The engineer, Kevin Lindsay of Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, failed to consider the low usage when designing the project, Cooney said.
Lindsay said he wouldn’t have done anything differently in hindsight. The only design solution would have been installing smaller pipes, and that would restrict the towns’ possibility for future growth, he said. He attributed the odor to a combination of stagnant sewage in the lines and the waste coming from a meat-processing plant in Falcon.
The new chemical additive, which costs about $1,300 a month, has drastically reduced hydrogen sulfide output.
The county believes the Public Works Commission should cover the costs because of a maintenance agreement that calls for PWC to maintain pumping stations and chemicals associated with operation.
The PWC argues that the chemical to stop the stink is not associated with operation.
Legal teams for the county and the PWC are still discussing the issue.
If the county has to pay for the chemicals, which will be added indefinitely, the roughly 500 customers of the Norcress system will likely see about a $2 increase on their monthly bills.
Staff writer John Ramsey can be reached at ramseyj@fayobserver.com or 486-3574.
Saturday, December 15, 2007
WORLD SMELLS BETTER THAN AT ANY TIME SINCE 1850
Eight of the ten most fragrant years of all time have occurred since 1994, despite a worldwide increase in urine.
In the 500 years following the Black Death the global smell remained consistently awful, a bit like a pair of damp gym socks, rubbed in pork and left inside a sack.
link
In the 500 years following the Black Death the global smell remained consistently awful, a bit like a pair of damp gym socks, rubbed in pork and left inside a sack.
link
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Top 15 Offensive Odors
A list of 15 of the worst smells imaginable. Wonderful scents and amazing smells fill the air all around us: freshly baked bread, perfume, flowers… but the aromas of pungency permeate as well.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Monday, December 10, 2007
Hidden smells send out strong signals
Telegraph.co.uk, United Kingdom -7 Dec 2007
Now a study has revealed that faint odours that we are unaware of can influence whether we like the look of someone, so that the faintest hint of body odour ...
TNPCB issues notice to CPCL
Hindu, India -7 Dec 2007
In a press release issued on Friday, the TNPCB said that the ill odour might have been caused by the release of hydrocarbon from the unit. ...
Telegraph.co.uk, United Kingdom -
Now a study has revealed that faint odours that we are unaware of can influence whether we like the look of someone, so that the faintest hint of body odour ...
TNPCB issues notice to CPCL
Hindu, India -
In a press release issued on Friday, the TNPCB said that the ill odour might have been caused by the release of hydrocarbon from the unit. ...
Thursday, December 06, 2007
Odour study going ahead
The Prince George Air Quality Implementation Committee has decided to carry out an odour study in Prince George. The study is meant to pinpoint odour sources, which will be used to help develop a plan to reduce strong-smelling emissions in the city.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Sunday, December 02, 2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)